EURING Newsletter - Volume 2, December
1998
The potential for co-ordinated projects carried on by large
numbers of ringers over wide geographical areas represents one of
the main features of the EURING community. In recent years, constant
mist-netting has been shown to be a very useful tool to monitor
bird populations on the basis of mark-recapture analyses. In this
article, Dawn Balmer and Will Peach illustrate the aims, organisation
and results of the British CES scheme. This very interesting approach
has already been introduced in the States through the local MAPS
project, and might soon become the basis for a larger EURING initiative.
CONSTANT EFFORT RINGING IN BRITAIN
AND IRELAND
By Dawn Balmer (1) and Will Peach
(2)
(1) BTO, NATIONAL CENTRE FOR ORNITHOLOGY, THE NUNNERY, THETFORD,
NORFOLK, IP24 2PU, UK (Email: dawn.balmer@bto.org)
(2) PRESENT ADDRESS: RSPB, THE LODGE, SANDY, BEDS SG19 2DL, UK (Email:
will.peach@rspb.org.uk)
Background
The British Trust for Ornithology's Constant Effort Sites (CES)
Scheme uses standardised mist-netting at more than a hundred study
sites to monitor the populations of a range of common passerines.
The scheme was initiated in 1983 as a pilot project with a volunteer
organiser. Following an evaluation of the scientific potential of
the CES Scheme (Baillie et al. 1986) the BTO took over full responsibility
for the project. The popularity of the scheme has continued to grow
and in 1996, 120 sites were operated throughout Britain and Ireland.
The CES Scheme monitors:
• changes in adult and juvenile abundance
• productivity (proportion of young birds in the catch)
• adult survival rates (from between-year recaptures).
The CES Scheme forms part of the BTO's Integrated Population Monitoring
(IPM) Programme, which incorporates the Common Birds Census, Breeding
Bird Survey, Nest Record Scheme and national Ringing Scheme, and
aims to identify the causes (natural and anthropogenic) of population
changes affecting breeding birds in Britain and Ireland.
Methods
Each year CES ringers are asked to make twelve visits to their
site spread evenly between early May and late August. A set of standard
mist nets is erected in the same positions on each of the twelve
main visits. The total length of standard netting is decided by
the ringer and is typically 100-200m. Ringers are asked to operate
their set of standard nets for at least six hours on each visit
and to standardise their chosen duration. A typical regime would
be to begin netting at dawn and continue until 1100hrs on each of
the twelve visits. The scheme has some flexibility and permits additional
nets to be used during main visits, and also extra visits.
Most constant effort sites are located in either wet or dry scrub,
reedbeds or deciduous woodland. Sites in coniferous woodland are
not accepted because rapid tree growth is likely to cause short-term
changes in catching efficiency and the local bird community. Potential
constant effort sites are proposed by volunteer ringers, and are
generally accepted into the scheme as long as they are located in
suitable habitats and are not considered to be undergoing major
successional changes. A quantitative system of habitat recording
was introduced in 1995 and all CES ringers are asked to record habitat
in the first year they operate their site, and then at regular intervals
thereafter.
Data collection and routine analysis
For each bird trapped on a CE site the following information is
computerised: ring number, species, age, sex (in the case of adults),
date(s) of capture and an additional net code to indicate whether
the bird was trapped in a standard CES net or in an additional net.
No information on biometrics, moult or brood patch is currently
collected, although this may be collected by the ringer.
CES capture data are submitted either on paper forms or on computer
disc. Paper submissions are computerised and checked by BTO staff.
A package of computer programs for ringers (B-RING) enables ringers
to computerise their ringing and recapture data and to carry out
most of the paperwork required for administrative purposes. In 1996,
data from 70% of CE sites were submitted on floppy disc.
Between-year changes in the catches of adults and young, and in
the percentage of young birds in the overall catch are published
annually in BTO News (Balmer & Peach 1997). The scheme's newsletter
CES News, is sent out each year to all CES ringers and
presents recent results and research.
Trends in adult and juvenile abundance
Using changes in standardized catch sizes we are able to measure
long-term changes in the abundance of adult and juvenile birds.
Long-term declines in catches of songbirds are of much greater conservation
concern than annual fluctuations linked to particular weather events.
For most species long-term changes in CES adult catches are very
similar to changes in the numbers of territories counted on Common
Birds Census plots, suggesting that standardised mist-netting is
a reliable method for assessing extensive changes in songbird populations.
In Britain & Ireland the largest increases in adult catches
have been for Robin, Wren, Greenfinch and Long-tailed Tit and the
largest decreases have been for Linnet, Redpoll, Spotted Flycatcher,
Yellowhammer, Reed Bunting and Willow Warbler. Examples of trends
in CES catches are presented for Willow Warbler and Reed Warbler
(Fig. 1).

Trends in productivity
The percentage of juveniles in the catch is a good indicator of
overall breeding success. Several intensive studies have shown that
annual catches of young birds in CES mist-nets do accurately reflect
local breeding success (e.g. du Feu & McMeeking 1991). Long-term
trends in the proportion of juveniles in CES catches are presented
for Long-tailed Tit and Dunnock (Fig. 2).

Poor weather during May 1996 resulted in the poorest
breeding season ever recorded by CES ringing, particularly for Dunnock,
Robin, Chiffchaff, Long-tailed Tit, Great Tit and Blue Tit.
Adult survival rates
Many passerines show strong site fidelity to breeding sites in
successive breeding seasons, so regular sampling of breeding birds
can be an effective means of generating between-year recaptures
which can be used to estimate survival (return) rates of adult birds.
Mark-recapture data from single CE sites are often quite sparse
and survival estimates for single sites often lack precision (Peach
1993). Recent advances in analytical techniques allow mark-recapture
data to be pooled across CE sites which usually leads to considerable
improvements in precision. Examples of adult survival rates from
combined datasets are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Adult survival rates calculated from retraps at CE sites.
| Species |
Annual adult survival |
Standard Error (%) |
| Wren |
31.8 |
6.8 |
| Dunnock |
42.2 |
4.0 |
| Blackbird |
56.6 |
3.6 |
| Reed Warbler |
49.6 |
2.6 |
| Lesser Whitethroat |
49.2 |
6.4 |
| Whitethroat |
43.7 |
5.4 |
| Garden Warbler |
71.5 |
6.3 |
| Blackcap |
44.3 |
5.7 |
| Chiffchaff |
38.0 |
8.6 |
| Willow Warbler |
37.1 |
5.0 |
| Treecreeper |
47.7 |
5.0 |
| Chaffinch |
48.9 |
13.1 |
Using CES data we have been able to demonstrate clear relationships
between survival rates of some long-distance migrants and annual
rainfall in the African winter quarters (Peach et al. 1991)
and between survival rates of resident species and winter weather
(Peach et al. 1995a).
Perhaps the best example of how retrap data from CE sites can be
used is for the Willow Warbler (Peach et al. 1995b). Until
the late 1980s the Willow Warbler was one of the most stable breeding
species monitored by the BTO Common Birds Census. However, during
the early 1990s there was a dramatic reduction in the numbers of
breeding birds counted on CBC plots. The decline was much more severe
in southern Britain (47% decline) than in northern Britain (7% decline).
A detailed analysis of nest record cards showed that there were
only minor changes in the breeding success of Willow Warblers during
this period, and these were far too small to account for the huge
reduction in breeding pairs. Annual survival rates of adult Willow
Warblers were calculated from retraps at 18 constant effort sites
and one colour-ringing study. The results showed that in northern
Britain, survival rates of adult birds averaged 39% and did not
change during the period 1987-93. But in southern Britain survival
rates of adults crashed from a healthy 45% in 1988 to just 24% in
1992 (Fig. 3). This huge decline in survival coincides with, and
probably caused, the population decline in southern Britain. When
survival rates improved in 1993, the number of breeding birds on
CBC plots stopped declining.
Increased mortality amongst adult Willow Warblers suggests that
problems in the African winter quarters have probably caused the
large decline in breeding birds.

Other schemes
CES-type ringing projects are now well established in France (Vansteenwegen
1997), Finland (Haapala & Saurola 1995), The Netherlands and
particularly in North America where there are currently more than
400 (MAPS) sites (Burnham 1995). We believe the scientific credibility
of constant-effort mist-netting is now well established and we urge
other ringing schemes to seriously consider setting up similar monitoring
projects.
A national scheme would not need 100 sites to be useful; 15-30
sites could provide high quality information for a range of species.
Further information on the BTO CES Scheme (instructions, articles
and newsletters) are available from Dawn Balmer at BTO, The Nunnery,
Thetford, Norfolk, UK, IP24 2PU. (e-mail
dawn.balmer@bto.org).
Further Reading
BALMER D. & PEACH W. 1997. Population changes on Constant Effort
Sites 1995-96. BTO News 208.
BURNHAM K. 1995. North America goes CES. BTO News 199.
DU FEU C. & MCMEEKING J. 1991. Does constant effort netting
estimate juvenile abundance? Ringing & Migration 12:
118-123.
HAAPALA J. & SAUROLA P. 1995. Constant Effort Sites Schemes
in Finland 1992-94. Linnut 3: 32-33.
PEACH W. J. 1993. Combining mark-recapture data sets for small
passerines. In: Lebreton, J.-D. & North, P.M. (Eds.) Marked
Individuals in the study of bird Populations, pp. 107-122 (Birkhauser
Verlag, Basel, Switzerland).
PEACH W.J., BAILLIE S.R. & UNDERHILL L. 1991. Survival of British
Sedge Warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in relation to
West African rainfall. Ibis 133: 300-305.
PEACH W., DU FEU C. & MCMEEKING J. 1995a. Site tenacity and
survival of Wrens and Treecreepers in a Nottinghamshire wood. Ibis
137: 497-507.
PEACH W, CRICK H. & MARCHANT J. 1995b. The demography of the
decline in the British Willow Warbler population. Journal of
Applied Statistics: 22, 905-922.
VANSTEENWEGEN C. 1997. Monitoring breeding bird populations by
capture in France. In The use of mist-nets to monitor bird populations
(eds C.J. Ralph & W.J. Peach). Proceedings of a technical
workshop held at Point Reyes Bird Observatory, California. US Forestry
Service. In press.
Back to index of EURING Newsletter
Volume 2
|