EURING
Newsletter - Volume 3 - July 2001
As mentioned
already, Constant Effort Site schemes are becoming increasingly
important methods to monitor bird populations; an inventory of CES
schemes in Europe has been produced by Romain Julliard. EURING is
now planning the launch of a Europe-wide CES project, as reported
here by Chris Wernham and Dawn Balmer.
CONSTANT
EFFORT RINGING IN EUROPE
OUTLINE OF PROJECT AIMS FOR
PARTICIPANT RINGING SCHEMES
by
Chris Wernham & Dawn Balmer
BRITISH TRUST
FOR ORNITHOLOGY
THE NUNNERY THETFORD, NORFOLK IP24 2PU
UNITED KINGDOM
E-mail: ringing@bto.org
Background
At the last
EURING General Meeting on Helgoland (autumn 1999) there was considerable
interest expressed by a number of Ringing Schemes in trying to standardise,
as far as possible, CES techniques across Europe, with the ultimate
aims of comparing species trends between countries and producing
combined trends at the European scale. At the meeting, the British
Trust for Ornithology (BTO) agreed to take the lead in developing
CES at the European scale, in collaboration with Romain Julliard
and the French Ringing Scheme. After discussions at the conference,
we needed to acquire funding to run a full pilot project. The Council
of the BTO has now agreed this funding, and we would like the project
proposed below to be carried out, beginning in the autumn of 2000.
For the project to be a success, we will need the support and assistance
of our colleagues in as many of the other European ringing schemes
and other organisations with existing constant effort ringing programmes
as possible.
Project aims
1. To assess
the current state of CES-type schemes in Europe, their protocols
and the species that are monitored satisfactorily.
Romain Julliard
has already assembled much of the information that is needed here,
for a recent report on the French constant-effort netting programme.
In order to run the current project, we will need to build on Romain's
results by again contacting individual schemes to find out more
about existing field methods and data collation, and to acquire
some sample data sets.
2. To develop
agreed protocols for CES fieldwork methodology, data exchange and
analysis.
We agreed at
the EURING meeting in autumn 1999 that the BTO would produce a set
of European CES fieldwork guidelines. With the newly acquired funding,
we will be able to take this a step further and provide guidance
on computerisation, in order to facilitate the combination of CES
data from the different schemes (probably based on the new EURING
exchange code with appropriate modifications).
3. To assess
the potential for producing combined European trends/comparative
national trends for a common suite of species.
In order to
fulfil this aim, we will need to acquire sample data sets from a
number of schemes. We should be able to find a number of species
common across countries, which we can use to assess national differences
in trends and the validity of a combined European trend. Britain
& Ireland, Finland and France have data spanning a concurrent period
of at least 10 years, while the Netherlands and Spain could be added
to run trends for five years.
Outputs
1. A set of
European CES field methodology and data exchange guidelines.
2. A short report
on the results of attempting to run comparative and combined trends
for a suite of species common to several countries.
3. A scientific
paper in a refereed journal (perhaps methodologically-based) if
the pilot results are of sufficient calibre. Joint authorship will,
of course, be offered to those schemes/organisations who have provided
sample data used in any such publication.
4. Access to
the above guidelines and results on the BTO web page, with translations
for at least the key countries/languages if at all possible (we
will need our European colleagues' help with this aim!).
5. A proposal
for further development of this European CES initiative, for discussion
at a subsequent EURING meeting, to allow us to seek future funding
for the benefit of CES ringing in Europe.
Time-scale
We hope to acquire
the necessary information and sample data from the individual schemes
during the winter of 2000/01. Assuming that our colleagues in the
other Schemes can reply fairly rapidly to our requests, we would
like to have a set of draft guidelines ready for comment by the
spring of 2001 (1 above). The report on trends (2 above) and the
web pages (4 above) would be put together during the remainder of
2001, ready for the guidelines to take effect for the 2002 breeding
season. Once items 1, 2 and 4 have been addressed, a proposal for
further development will be written (4 above) and a scientific paper
prepared, if the results are deemed suitable (3 above).
Return
to Contents Page
|